The choosen animation for this aesthetics evaluation is “Sang Kancil Dengan Monyet”. In mine subjective opinion from this animation, four criteria has been set based on SUBJECTIVISM, i.e:

     The first criteria  is refered to the monkey was pretended in hunger and needed  food. When we watch the animation, I think audiences will be more carefully and fell afraid to believe somebody immediately  when he in this situation like in this animation, monkey was lying the mousedeer and tortoise for get some food with say he not eaten and in hunger. This animation also want to tell about deception like this and it is happened since former.

     Second criteria is refered to reciprocation  was acquire by monkey was eat chilli because lying the mousedeer and tortoise. It is mean all of  bad deed have a reciprocation either now or late. The animation is give educate audiences  for not doing something like monkey in this animation.

     The third criteria is tell the situation of audiences was looked this animation will become a good fell like happy and always smile until end this animation because  the animation is have  humour element. Maybe, this is a usual animation if we compare wiith anothers animation but message in this animation is very clear and  easy to understand by all level of audiences either kids,tenagers or older and should be able to born a good feeling for all audiences was watching this animation.

     Last criteria is tell about instruction will get for audiences when watchthis animation. the instruction in this animation was very usefull for audiences because this animation also tell about the situation in the world now was full with deception.

     Deferred from  my friend in emotivism criteria, his opinion is  audience should be touched with the friendship between the character instantly after watching the animation. I know, his refer to mousedeer and tortoise was helped the monkey. But for me, I not accept with this opinion, because it is a normal reflection from others  friends when he look his friend was in adversity. Automaticly he must helped his friend. So, I think it is a normal and cannot be proud about this like “ touced with friendship”  but we must proud about his element nature is helped not think it is friend or enemy.